lol typical "I'm not the real racist, it's liberals!!" defense.

http://newsone.com/nation/casey-gane-mcc...-revealed/

Bam.

well, apparently those newsletters had many authors so unfortunately it gave him a bad name even though his name was merely attached to the paper. Was irresponsible on his part to not check what is being released under his name, take this as you will, though.


Also, I don't see how one could negate how damaging it is for society that we view everyone as groups. It just creates clashing between each of them, and power struggles. Its actually why I believe that racial miscegenation is important for society.

Austin NAACP President Nelson Linder, who has known Ron Paul for 20 years, unequivocally dismissed charges that the Congressman was a racist in light of recent smear attempts, and said the reason for him being attacked was that he was a threat to the establishment.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/jan...racist.htm

Oh well, if he says so.

(August 15, 2011 01:56 AM)Lane said: Also, I don't see how one could negate how damaging it is for society that we view everyone as groups. It just creates clashing between each of them, and power struggles. Its actually why I believe that racial miscegenation is important for society.

That's actually my problem with the Left, being a progressive myself. Universal human rights should prevail before group rights. For example, I think that there should be a system put in place to medically check and follow-up immigrant women from countries where FGM is common to ensure that they do not perpetuate the practice once they arrive in the West. But the fucking Left, instead of thinking about the pain that could be avoided to those innocent little girls, think about the fucking groups rights and refuse to implement such a "racist" system.

Meanwhile, little girls are sacrificed everyday on western kitchen tables in the name of "freedom of religion" and "multiculturalism".

My dream is having a socialist left that's not scared of putting their pants on and protecting the most vulnerables of us. That should be their job but seems like they forgot it.

(August 15, 2011 10:54 AM)brad-t said: Oh well, if he says so.

He took moral responsibility for the newsletters.

He took responsibility for them by denying they reflect his views despite being published under his name in his own publication?

"The quotations in The New Republic article are not mine and do not represent what I believe or have ever believed. I have never uttered such words and denounce such small-minded thoughts.

"In fact, I have always agreed with Martin Luther King, Jr. that we should only be concerned with the content of a person's character, not the color of their skin. As I stated on the floor of the U.S. House on April 20, 1999: 'I rise in great respect for the courage and high ideals of Rosa Parks who stood steadfastly for the rights of individuals against unjust laws and oppressive governmental policies.'

"This story is old news and has been rehashed for over a decade. It's once again being resurrected for obvious political reasons on the day of the New Hampshire primary.

"When I was out of Congress and practicing medicine full-time, a newsletter was published under my name that I did not edit. Several writers contributed to the product. For over a decade, I have publically taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/08...80513.html

New Ron Paul ad.

Lol.

Liberty.

Title.

Truth.

That was so lame, lol

like one of those corny movie previews in a theater

(August 18, 2011 12:59 PM)Lane said: That was so lame, lol

like one of those corny movie previews in a theater

They'll get better later in the campaign.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2022745/

Old news, but if only I could reply to comments.

follow the money

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/poli...le2137070/

g'bye, jack